Governance workflows
Issue management, remediation approvals, effectiveness review, learning logs, and evidence traceability.
- • Issue registration standards
- • Root-cause and action planning
- • Closure and residual risk
- • Audit trail expectations
Support
A practical help centre for implementation, governance workflows, role-specific usage, troubleshooting, and inspection readiness.
Guidance here is operational and product-specific. It does not replace legal advice, clinical advice, or regulatory determinations.
Issue management, remediation approvals, effectiveness review, learning logs, and evidence traceability.
Clear expectations for every role the platform supports — Nominated Individuals, Responsible Individuals, Directors, Managers, Organisation Admins, Staff, Group Admins, and Inspectors.
Rollout sequencing, provider onboarding, evidence ownership, and enterprise operating models.
Operational fixes for stale evidence, overdue actions, permissions mismatches, and inspection preparation pressure.
Operational playbooks
Role guides
Troubleshooting
Check whether the remediation actions are merely marked complete or whether an effectiveness review has actually been recorded with residual risk and outcome.
Review naming, ownership, and whether the document is linked to the relevant issue, bundle, or workflow. Retrieval speed is a governance quality problem, not just a filing problem.
Confirm the user is assigned to the correct provider, then recheck their role and any impersonation/session context before changing permissions.
This is by design. If the manager has been assigned to specific services, they can only see data for those services. The NI can grant access to additional services from Organisation → Team → Change homes.
Untick all of the manager's homes in Organisation → Team → Change homes. With no specific services assigned, they'll see all services within the provider. Re-assign them when the temporary access is no longer needed.
Rehearse who retrieves evidence, who answers governance questions, and which records should remain read-only. Inspection mode should protect integrity, not create confusion.
That organisation has ended the engagement (or the NI/RI left it). This is by design — access is granted per organisation and revoked the same way. The engagement history is still recorded; the live data is not. If it was a mistake, the organisation can re-send the engagement from Organisation → NI/RI Engagements.
The 'Active organisation' switcher only lists organisations where the engagement is Active. Check Account → Engagements: a pending engagement needs accepting first, and a declined or ended one needs the organisation to re-send it.
Either that organisation has turned off 'Allow this organisation to engage an NI/RI who also works elsewhere' in Organisation → Settings, or the NI/RI's own primary organisation has. Both must allow it.
FAQ
No. The platform supports governance workflows, evidence readiness, and structured oversight. Decisions remain with the provider leadership team and NI/RI.
Yes. Provider records remain separated while group leadership can review patterns, escalations, and readiness themes at the right oversight level.
Yes. The NI, RI, or admin can assign managers to specific services. Once assigned, they only see governance data for those services. NIs, RIs, and Directors always see all services.
Starter and Growth cover one registered service. More than one registered service under one account, with a group dashboard across them, is part of the Enterprise plan. An NI/RI accountable to several separate organisations sees them all in the Control Tower, whatever plan each organisation is on.
Compare plansYes. An organisation engages the NI/RI by email from Organisation → NI/RI Engagements; the NI/RI accepts from Account → Engagements. That organisation then appears in the NI/RI's Control Tower — a live cross-organisation roll-up of open issues, overdue actions, audits in progress, and visits due — alongside any others. One click switches into an organisation to work on its records. Each organisation grants and ends the engagement independently.
Nothing: each organisation pays for its own plan.
More in the pricing FAQEach organisation always owns its own governance records. The NI/RI's Control Tower is computed live per request and never copied into a personal store, so when an organisation ends the engagement its data disappears from that NI/RI's view immediately. Only the fact that the engagement started and ended is kept, in the audit trail.
Open high-risk issues, overdue remediation actions, recent evidence gaps, pending approvals, and whether any closed issues still lack effectiveness review discipline.
Three options: 1) CSV Import — upload spreadsheets via the Connectors page. 2) Source System Integration — connect your source system via webhook for automatic data flow (Growth and Enterprise plans). 3) Manual Entry — create records directly in the platform. Enterprise customers get assisted migration.
Any system with webhook, API, or CSV export capability. No SDK required.
Yes. Your Organisation Admin can assign each NI or RI to specific services. NI 'A' only sees their assigned services — they cannot see NI 'B's services. This is ideal for large organisations with services under different regulators.
Each service has: regulator (CQC/Ofsted/CIW/Care Inspectorate/RQIA), service type (Residential/Nursing/Children's/etc.), capacity, registration ID, address, registered manager, and assigned NI/RI. The regulator determines whether the service uses 'Nominated Individual' or 'Responsible Individual' terminology. CQC and Ofsted mappings are fully verified; CIW, Care Inspectorate, and RQIA reference-code mappings are live but flagged pending final compliance review — check the current status for your regulator before relying on the generated reference list unsupervised.
AssuraFlow has a formal handover process. The outgoing NI/RI signs off the governance state, the incoming NI/RI reviews and accepts, and role-appointment history keeps a permanent, queryable record of who held the NI/RI/Manager role and when — not just the offboarding moment. The full transition is recorded in the audit trail with electronic signatures. No governance data is lost. This is your organisation's own governance-continuity record — it doesn't replace the separate statutory notification you must still send to your regulator (e.g. CQC's Regulation 15 'Notice of changes') when your Nominated or Responsible Individual changes.
When the provider needs to preserve governance-record integrity during an active inspection or equivalent high-scrutiny event where read-only access is safer than live editing.
An Android phone app is in pilot and not yet in an app store; an iPhone app is to follow. Setting it up is covered in the guide above.
What it covers, in the pricing FAQYou can build your own. The template builder supports sections, question types including multiple-choice, evidence rules, and required/critical flags, and templates can be published or cloned across services.
Policies are versioned and move through Draft, Published, and Archived states. Staff acknowledgement tracking starts the moment a policy is published, and a completion-percentage rollup shows who has and hasn't acknowledged it. Archiving a policy preserves its acknowledgement evidence rather than deleting it.
Both, by design. A scheduled sweep automatically escalates unacknowledged critical or high-severity issues and overdue remediation actions to the accountable person, so nothing relies purely on someone remembering to chase it. Acting on an item before the sweep runs simply prevents the escalation.
Yes. The dashboard supports Light, Dark, and System themes, switchable from the sidebar on any page, including keyboard and screen-reader accessible controls.
The AI support desk answers at any time; sensitive topics such as safeguarding, data protection and contract questions are passed to a person to follow up.
Support on each planEach person has a running allowance balance that updates with every deposit, withdrawal, or purchase — reversible cleanly if a record is deleted, so the balance is never left wrong. A transaction over a threshold you configure, or too many in a short window, is flagged for review automatically. Receipts attach to individual transactions, and a monthly reconciliation is stamped and attributed to whoever confirmed it.
Incidents are auto-classified from what's written — falls, medication errors, safeguarding concerns, injuries, property damage, near misses — and given a statutory notification deadline based on that classification's severity, escalated automatically if it's missed. Regulator-specific notification guidance is shown alongside it: verified for CQC today, with every other regulator's guidance clearly flagged as pending compliance review rather than guessed at.
No. The AI assistant — whether drafting from a chat conversation or triggered by a recurring incident/risk pattern crossing a threshold you set — only ever produces a draft proposal. Governance issues, remediation actions, and standalone tasks are permanently excluded from auto-execution by design; an NI/RI always reviews and approves before anything becomes a real record.
Yes, as an opt-in checkbox on the export — never applied silently. Redaction targets structured identifiers with a well-defined format: UK National Insurance number, NHS number (checksum-verified, not just any 10-digit run), email address, phone number, and postcode. It does not attempt to redact names or free-text addresses — no reliable detector for those exists, and claiming to catch them would be riskier than not offering the feature at all.
Yes. Schedule the next independent-visitor review (Reg 44) or quality-of-care review (Reg 45) per service with your own cadence. Starting a visit runs the same checklist, evidence, and staged sign-off as any other audit template — tag a template as Ofsted-specific and it's ready to use. Once a visit is signed off, the next one on that cadence schedules itself automatically.
Work with the AssuraFlow team on role mapping, provider setup, evidence ownership, and governance adoption sequencing.